After world order, the protection Council (SC) typically

After the League of Nations’ failure, the second try at making a peace system
was the UN’s second institution within only a few decades.
Yet, throughout the conflict peace was about to fail once
again, as most of the world was divided into two blocs. as
a result of the UN’s rigid structure that was supposed to keep
up the establishment of the international world order, the
protection Council (SC) typically found itself in a stalemate state
of affairs, unable to act with efficiency. Indeed, on many occasions,
it may be said that the SC had been used as a tool of Brobdingnagian
influence. It would, however, be inaccurate to mention that each one of
the UN’s actions throughout the conflict were just caused
by state leverage. This essay argues that whereas the UN failed
to accomplish its final goal of maintaining peace and
security throughout the conflict (and still has not done so till today), it
had been more productive in fields such as decolonization and
human rights. a short general overview of the UN System
is given, followed by a additional centered analysis of
cases in which the UN was said to have been
used as a superpower tool, such as Korea and also the Congo.
This essay acknowledges, however, that not all UN failures throughout the conflict were
caused by the East-West division but also by different deep
divisions between states, such as between Israel and its neighboring
countries. furthermore, it then discusses UN achievements
that weren’t stymied by great power influence, like decreasing colonialism,
supporting the right to self-determination, serving as a platform for
the ‘developing world’ and endorsing human rights.

While it some hoped that the UN would be more prosperous than
its predecessor, both organizations had challenges in similar problems. both the
League of nations and also the UN were engineered upon 2 fundamentally opposed
approaches to international relations: the tradition of the ‘Concert of
Europe’ and also the ‘Peace Project’ tradition (Brown, Ainley, 2009:
144). consistent with the Concert of Europe, the great Powers
were to possess an enormous responsibility and manage and coordinate
policies on matters of common concern, therefore maintaining a
balance of power among states (ibid: 145). Of course, ‘common interest’
was sometimes interpreted through the lens of the great Powers’
interests (ibid.). The Peace Project, on the other hand, that
was significantly influenced by Kant’s ‘Perpetual Peace’, rested upon the
idea that eventually war may well be made obsolete through
the regional and international cooperation of states (ibid.). Hence, the UN was
created with liberal visionary intentions primarily to avoid a
third destructive world war and preserve world peace and security
(Article 1.1), as well as to acknowledge the
sovereignty of states and give a voice to each state within
the General Assembly (GA). Stalin remarked at Yalta in
1945 that “the main factor was to forestall quarrels in
the future of the three great Powers USA,
Britain, and the USSR and the task, therefore, was to secure
their unity for the future” (FRUS, 1955: 666). His view was
shared by President Roosevelt (ibid: 667). Thus, from the start the UN additionally reflected a
realist great power chain of command, because the main
decision-making organ of the UN, the security Council, included only five permanent
members: the U.S., the UK, the USSR, France and China (Cassese, 2005:
317). These 5 great Powers in agreement to maintain peace
and security for the common good, but especially, of
course, when it had been in their own interests. in line
with Articles 2.3 and 2.4, states ought to peacefully
settle disputes and therefore the use of force is prohibited. underneath Article 39,
the SC might elect the utilization of force if there’s a
threat to peace, a breach of the same, or an act of aggression
(Higgins, 1995: 446). each of the Big-Five received a veto
power, that could stop SC decisions from being created. to
this date, the liberal and realist elements of the UN System remain one
of its greatest paradoxes. The UN still reflects the era of
1945, as its structure doesn’t simply allow for reform
(Luck, 2004: 361).
In the Second World War’s aftermath, most of the world soon were
separated between two sides, one being the U.S.and the other Soviet
influence. Roosevelt’s vision of the security Council as ” the
world’s board of directors ” with the responsibility to enforce
“the peace against any potential miscreant” collapsed (Kissinger,
1995: 395). each of the 2superpowers focused on conserving order
and stability in its own sphere of influence whereas respecting the
other’s party (Cassese, 2005: 323). superpower competition primarily surfaced concerning influential spheres in
the developing world, as well as in strategic areas, and often led to
proxy-war sort conflicts in these regions (ibid.). This competition
was, of course, reflected within the SC and therefore the P-5’s
veto power would typically serve as a tool to form a
stalemate, like in the 1956 suez Crisis, matters in
Vietnam from 1946-75, the Sino-Vietnamese conflict in 1979 and Islamic
State of Afghanistan from 1979 (Roberts, Kingsbury, 1993: 6).  

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Though, UN’s
failure was in its ultimate aim of maintaining peace and security. Most SC action
was hampered by the conflict of the great forces. moreover, once they took action, they’d typically abuse the tool and in several cases, they only prolonged the
conflict (as in Cyprus, where peacekeepers remain today). nonetheless, the UN wasn’t a complete failure. They created vital progress in alternative fields,
excluding that of maintaining peace and also the settling disputes
(Cassese, 2005: 323).
One of UN’s main successes was decolonization, that was supported
by both great powers, so as to diminish the colonial empires’ power and gain additional spheres of
influence. In 1960, once decolonization was already way advanced, the GA Affirmed that “all individuals have the
right for self-determination” (Dunbabin, 2007: 458). New independent states, of
course, strived to affix the UN, as a symbol of their sovereignty and therefore, legitimacy
(ibid.). Gradually, the developing countries began to make a majority among the GA. The
developing countries then established UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) in 1964,
in hopes of furthering their plea for economic justice with completely
different visions from those of the Bretton Woods establishments (Williams,
1994: 179). With efforts to stay in rule a brand new International Economic Order on behalf of the ‘Third
World’ had not verythriving, some would argue that the UN already created this important accomplishment, a platform for
developing countries to formulate a coherent system of concepts, acceptive the principle
of sovereign equality (Krasner, 1985: 7). Indeed, the UN was conjointly used as a
tool by the ‘Third World’ for it to achieve influence. Moreover, they created vast progress legally for human
rights through the approval of vital Declarations and Conventions (Cassese, 2005: 323;
Felice, 1990: 595). In between, these documents additionally contributed
to the process and further development of law. moreover, UN specialized agencies such as UNICEF, UNESCO, and also the World Food Programme were established and achieved abundant in their
fields of expertise.
To summarize, efficient UN action had in reality hindered by world
power conflict that was based on each geopolitical and ideological factors.
These conditions triggered many brutal proxy wars, like in Korea, the Congo and
Vietnam, that were usually even prolonged by some branches of the great forces. several peacekeeping
missions failed or never left. Atrocious genocides like in Cambodia and in Guatemala were never ceased by the UN. instead
of acting as a peace system, the SC remained divided throughout the cold
war. Hence, ‘Divided States’ might have actually been a more accurate term than
‘United Nations’ (Roberts, Kingsbury, 1993: 10). Yet, the UN wasn’t a
complete disaster and beyond question the cold
war world was better off with than without it (Weiss, Daws, 2007: 11). Some improvements in terms of
achieving peaceful cooperation were created, largely by simply providing a peaceful platform for international discussion.
Throughout the conflict, the UN’s worth engulfed into something that differed from the initially intended, concentrating more on aspects like human rights
and self-determination. the same concept remained to this day and perhaps, the chance had already come and gone to rethink the UN’s role. Maintaining world peace and
security has thus far proved impossible; on the other hand, it’s attainable to
create small steps towards gradually making this
world a much better place.

Comments are closed.